Hello, Horny Readers! Especially you, peterteasetoy! It’s you I have to thank for the intriguing idea that’s been on My mind since you mentioned it to Me a day or two ago: the reverse of CFNM! Yes, interesting, right?
The way peter explained it is (and I have to agree), wouldn’t it be a good form of cockteasing for a male to remain restricted in his clothes while the scintillating woman he desires is naked as much as she likes? And further, what if she were able to masturbate at will, and he was compelled to watch, or even assist, all while ignoring the raging boner straining at his clothes?
Wouldn’t that be great?
There are some differences between CFNM and CMNF.
I mean, I guess you could say that CFNM is more geared toward those of you who enjoy the humiliation and vulnerability of exposure, and CMNF is more in the cockteasing school, but then again, I bet W/e can all agree that some of the best cockteasing has elements of humiliation involved.
Public cockteasing almost always begets a bit of public humiliation, when a hard on or the wet spot caused by pre cum is sometimes hard to hide!
Granted, it’s even harder to hide if you’re completely naked, but let’s face it, unless you’re on a nude beach, the laws in most places make public CFNM implausible. But in a private setting, or in the world of Femdom fantasy where W/e can do and be anything, anywhere, it’s an alluring scenario!
Certainly something to consider for those of you who are lucky enough to have a wife or girlfriend who likes to tease you at home.
The sacred Yoni: peter makes a good point!
peterteasetoy also mentioned that Women are Goddesses whose lady parts are worthy of admiration and worship. He further points out that the parts of (most) males should be controlled and sometimes avoided. CMNF would ensure that.
A man’s clothing would be a sort of natural form of bondage, while a Woman’s natural goddess-like nature would only be elevated by being free to be nude or partially nude at all times. I would personally exert even more control by controlling the man’s gaze. He would lower his eyes on command.
Imagine the erotic strain of knowing that I was naked somewhere in his proximity, but that he was not allowed to look!
I wonder if that would be more of a tease, or a reprieve from teasing?
Anyway, weigh in in the comments! What do you think about CMNF?
And thanks again, peter! My love for teasing you has been fruitful in more ways than one!
(10/14/22) Looking for your comment? You see, when One is actually in charge, rather than cosplaying, One gets to approve comments. Or, as the case may be, relegate them to the garbage where they belong.
You can think of yourself as anything you like, but here, Women reign.
Share your fever dreams elsewhere, “Dorian”.
xx
Goddess Rachel
1-800-356-6169
I like cfnm.. Just being vulnerable to hot women is turnon. Especially if it involves dressing me in bra/panty/slip/dress/putting makeup on me then I can do cmcf.
Heh! Gotcha, petey!
You’re welcome Miss Rachel, *squirm* I’m glad that you liked the idea so much!
Miss Cindy *squirm* summed up CFNM well, calling the man “worthless”. The whole scenario is based on the premise of the woman being ‘nasty’ to the man. She belittles, denigrates, degrades and humiliates the man over his naked body/cock, and if that is what the guy wants, or feels he deserves, than that is fine but, sometimes the male is looking for a benevolent dictator to submit to, rather than a tyrant.
And what if the male is happy and comfortable in his skin, maybe even confident, then the woman being ‘nasty’ just makes her appear to be lying and therefore untrustworthy, or stupid, and neither of those qualities are ones you want to see in a Mistress!
Here’s an example of where CFNM can go wrong. We’re having a spell of hot weather at the moment, and say the man is a naturist. He is in his element, being naked, whereas the woman is feeling hot and flustered under unnecessary layers of clothing, Without the ‘nasty’ element the scenario is utterly pointless for an F/m scene, and actually works more as a M/f scene.
The reverse situation that I am talking about, is not about the female being naked as such, but about the female having the freedom to dress to showcase and show off her superior female form in the smallest amount of attire that she chooses, while the male stays fully clothed even though the provocative sights of the women around him are making his arousal increasing uncomfortable!
Imagine this scenario, the female is dressed in a long, silky cocktail dress, clinging to her every curve, without a bra or panties underneath. The male, already horny from the sight of her, is fully dressed in a suit. She calls him over to watch, then slides her hand through the thigh split in her dress and up to her bare pussy. She then rubs herself to a shuddering climax, while watching his growing frustration and his awkwardness in wearing clothing that was never designed with room for his erection!
The female is totally empowered by her sexuality, while the male is enslaved by it!
It is intriguing from a ‘delicious frustration’ perspective. I could see trying it if my “clothing bondage” was all sissy, amping up my arousal. I’m not in the camp of orgasm denial so the teasing should lead to some sort of humiliating release… perhaps the Mistress/woman ‘relents’ at the end and informs me I can masturbate as long as I don’t move my clothing. Then it becomes a humiliating rubbing or humping in my sissy outfit until I cream my panties. 🙂
gemsissy, I saw a sissy on Tumblr ejaculate sissy cream right through her panties. Your comment made me think of that. *giggle*
That sounds delicious… of course, I would have to clean up my panties with my tongue. 😉
Men need to be denied an orgasm and to be treated worthless while naked before a female. I like to see them on webcam becoming flustered, hot, red and or feeling as though they want to run away and hide. In the end, the ideal male enjoys CFNM as his rightful servitude.
Ooh YES! Crack that whip, Miss Cindy!
Wow, that is some food for thought Mistress Rachel! The exquisite torture of CFNM is, of course, more of the “mainstream” (meaning more thoroughly explored, not “vanilla”)…but how about a male clothed in female underwear under his boy-clothes, forced to endure the visual enticements of She whom he is meant to Please? A sort of “clothed cuckoldry”? There are dimensions to explore here…
I am squirming at the thought of it…and I DO appreciate your thought-provoking blog!
Thank you, subpantieboi, on all counts! I like your ideas!